The Government Would Save $400 Million If It Just Switched Font Style
Of
the many schemes to make the government more efficient, this is
probably the only one that involves typography. A middle schooler in
Pittsburgh has calculated that by simply switching the typeface used in
government documents from Times New Roman to Garamond, it would save
taxpayers $400 million in ink.
Suvir
Mirchandani was inspired by an earlier project looking at how to save
ink in teacher handouts. He recorded the ink usage of four different
fonts—Garamond, Times New Roman, Century Gothic and Comic Sans—and found
that Garamond's thin strokes would save his school district 24 percent
in ink
Then he decided to apply his results to a bigger scale: the U.S. government. He sampled documents from different government agencies and dug through printing budgets. As CNN reports, this is what he found.
Using the Government Services Administration's estimated annual cost of ink — $467 million—Suvir concluded that if the federal government used Garamond exclusively it could save nearly 30%—or $136 million per year. An additional $234 million could be saved annually if state governments also jumped on board, he reported.
These
numbers are only estimates, of course, but they show how subtle changes
made many times over add up to big differences. (Also, ink is mad
expensive. By ounce, it costs more than Chanel No. 5 perfume, as
Mirchandani points out.) And our government is still a prodigal producer
of printed goods. Every day, for example, we print 2,000 copies of the Federal Register, which regularly runs to hundreds of pages.
The
government has to be at least somewhat transparent about its printing
practices, but the rest of us—those of us who still print things out,
anyway—could take a cue, too. In 2010, the University of Wisconsin,
Green Bay changed the default typeface of its email system from Arial to Century Gothic to save ink. And of course, there are special ink-saving typeface with tiny holes in the letters.
Prefer to choose your typeface based on aesthetics alone? By all means, go ahead—just don't print anything out.
No comments:
Post a Comment